Introduction The gap between engineering and IP is a structural problem in most product companies. Engineering teams build to a specification. IP teams review for infringement risk. The two processes rarely happen simultaneously — and the cost of that gap...
Introduction Most freedom-to-operate searches stop at text. For software and business method patents, that is often sufficient. For hardware, semiconductor, mechanical, and electromechanical products, it is not. In these technology areas, the critical prior art is frequently in the drawing...
Introduction Traditional freedom-to-operate analysis is slow, fragmented, and often inconclusive. IP teams spend days running Boolean searches across multiple databases, manually reviewing abstracts, and compiling results into reports that arrive after the engineering decision has already been made. That timeline...
Introduction Semiconductor patents don’t license like software patents. A single chip can infringe dozens of patent claims simultaneously — spanning materials, fabrication processes, circuit architecture, and system-level integration. Implementation occurs at multiple levels of the supply chain: chip designers, foundry...
Introduction Approximately 50% of all patents granted by the USPTO come from continuation applications. Most companies file continuations reactively — when a product changes, when a claim is challenged in litigation, or when a competitor’s design-around exposes a gap in...
Introduction Competitive M&A deal processes give you five to ten days for patent due diligence. Traditional patent due diligence takes three to six weeks, involves hundreds of billable hours from IP counsel, and — given time constraints — typically covers...